tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14733404.post6032586332658104017..comments2024-01-08T05:50:04.098-05:00Comments on baxter sez: Reproductive rights rhetoricAlison Piepmeierhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17972854288403934814noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14733404.post-40341135492301560212007-10-14T10:47:00.000-05:002007-10-14T10:47:00.000-05:00If you read the study, the results are very proble...If you read the study, the results are very problematic. There are a lot of young girls/women who become more esteemed by claiming to have had an abortion in countries where it is illegal. I think that is known as 'oppositional culture' among you Academics.<BR/><BR/>What also about the journal? The Lancet is also that journal where the editors told a doctor that they are ethically bound to commit euthanasia in the 1800's [in giving lethal doses of morphine to patients who were perceived to have pain].<BR/><BR/>Clearly, the study is flawed and from a questionable journal. If it reflects 'women's studies' scholarship, its not surprising that Roe v. Wade will get overturned by any judiciary with IQs above a chimp.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com